Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
For our justification in thinking that a given sequence is random will be based on its passing only finitely many tests; we can be justified in believing pseudorandom sequence to be random (in some respectable sense of justification, as long as justification is weaker than truth), and justified in making the inference to chance via RCT.
The justification is obvious.
Second, the justification is not specific enough.
The justification is "jobs".
The justification is given below.
The justification was Stanleyesque.
But by definition the first justification, preventing flight, is weak or nonexistent where removal seems a remote possibility at best.
"The boy is weak.
The argument is weak.
The demand is weak.
The President is "weak".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com