While this item was intended for only females to respond, a number of males (Urdu, n = 2; English, n = 2) responded to the item indicating that they preferred a male.
The most frequently endorsed response category was category 3 (all), which was endorsed by 48.8%to82.9%9% of respondents depending on the item, indicating strong ceiling effects and/or bias towards acquiescent responding.
This activity focused mainly on the revisions of the items indicated.
Tetrachoric correlations among the items indicated that items 8 and 9 of Lipkus-J were highly correlated (ρ = .99).99
This value of the items indicated that respondents were interacting with diverse community member occasionally or never at all.
However, the residual correlation matrix of the items indicated that the four subscales had local item dependency which grouped the items into their respective subscales.
The result of the factor analysis for evaluating dimensionality of the items indicated six factors among the 26 items (Table 2).
In this evaluation respondents were asked whether they have provided the items indicated in the list, if so the date of introduction of the food item and the frequency of administration and quantity.
If you are worried about hurting their feelings, you could try and get an exchange without a receipt, assuming there are labels on the items indicating where it came from.
