the interview was

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "the interview was" is correct and can be used in written English.
For example, "The interview was conducted via Skype due to the pandemic."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The interview was over".

The New York Times - Sports

The interview was a trap.

The New York Times - Books

The interview was widely praised.

The New York Times - Arts

The interview was humiliating.

The Guardian

The interview was strange.

The Guardian - Music

The interview was the second for Byrnes.

The New York Times - Sports

I assumed the interview was over.

The New Yorker

The interview was lightly edited and condensed.

The New York Times

The interview was available live on broadband.

The New York Times - Sports

The interview was conducted in French.

The New York Times - Sports

The interview was edited and condensed.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "the interview was", ensure the context clearly establishes which interview you are referring to. If it's the first mention, consider adding more detail such as "the job interview was".

Common error

Avoid using "the interview was" without prior context, as it can leave the reader wondering which interview you're talking about. To prevent confusion, specify the type of interview or provide context clues before or during the description.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "the interview was" typically functions as a clause element, specifically as the subject and verb of a sentence. It introduces a statement about the state or characteristic of a particular interview. Ludwig AI confirms that this usage is correct and common across a wide range of sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

41%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "the interview was" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to introduce statements about an interview. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread usage. It functions primarily to provide information or express opinions about the interview, with a neutral register that suits various contexts, from formal reports to casual discussions. While the phrase is common in "News & Media" and "Science", specifying the context of the interview is crucial for clarity. By considering related phrases and common errors, writers can effectively use "the interview was" to convey their intended meaning with precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the discussion took place

Focuses on the act of discussing rather than the formal setting of an interview.

the meeting happened

Emphasizes the occurrence of the meeting itself, suitable when the nature of the interaction is less important.

the session was conducted

Emphasizes the structured and managed nature of the interaction.

the conversation unfolded

Highlights the organic and evolving nature of the dialogue.

the interrogation occurred

Specifically implies a more formal or investigative questioning process.

the assessment transpired

Suitable for contexts where the interview's primary function is evaluation or assessment.

the exchange was held

Highlights the act of exchanging information or opinions.

the Q&A took place

Emphasizes the question-and-answer format of the interaction.

the questioning unfolded

Highlights the progressive nature of the questioning.

the inquiry was performed

Suggests a systematic and formal investigation.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "the interview was"?

Consider alternatives like "the meeting happened", "the discussion took place", or "the session was conducted" depending on the specific context.

What does it mean when someone says "the interview was conducted"?

It means that the interview took place and was carried out in a structured manner. The focus is on the process of questioning and answering.

Is it correct to say "the interview was held"?

Yes, it's grammatically correct. Saying "the interview was held" is another way of stating that the interview took place. This emphasizes the event of the interview.

What is the difference between saying "the interview was good" and "the interview went well"?

While both phrases express a positive outcome, "the interview was good" focuses on the quality of the interview itself. "The interview went well" /s/the+interview+went+well focuses on the process and how smoothly it progressed.