Sentence examples for the interpretation of the same from inspiring English sources

Comparing visual inspection results of graphed data reveals inconsistencies in the interpretation of the same graph among single-case experimental design (SCED) researchers and practitioners.

There is a general consensus among participants regarding probable syndromes suggested by the interpretation of the same result and most laboratories also agree on further investigations to be carried out for several diseases.

Criterion 4: If FM1 and FM2 identify the same possible futures (P1…Pn) and are based on the interpretation of the same facts (F1,…, Fn) but FM1 is able to show better than FM2 which futures provide better interpretations of given facts than others, then FM1 is a better justification.

After explaining that the meaning of a term depends on the theory to which it belongs, and that a consequence of theoretical advance is meaning change, Duhem continued: "If the theories admitted by this physicist are those we accept, and if we agree to follow the same rules in the interpretation of the same phenomena, we speak the same language and can understand each other.

The difference between [9] and the present paper lies largely in the interpretation of the same observations.

Thus, the interpretation of the same symptom could differ among GPs.

However, we did conduct analyses including both cases and controls, adjusting for case status, and found that the interpretation of the results remained the same.

Despite some differences in the sensitivities and specificities recorded for T2 compared to those of T1, the interpretation of the results remains the same as that described for T1.

We should, but the letter of the law and the interpretation of the law are not the same thing, and there is something genuinely grotesque in Extell's interpretation of the affordability mandate a mandate that exists not simply to house non-millionaires in Manhattan but expressly to house them alongside millionaires.

We should, but the letter of the law and the interpretation of the law are not the same thing, and there is something genuinely grotesque in Extell's interpretation of the affordability mandate — a mandate that exists not simply to house non-millionaires in Manhattan but expressly to house them alongside millionaires.

To get their money, cities have to submit the ROPS report every six months to the Department of Finance, and there's no guarantee the rules or the interpretation of the rules will be the same each time or that the redevelopment law with its vagaries and inconsistencies will not be changed yet again.