Sentence examples for the interpretation of reliability from inspiring English sources

We present a time-dependent numerical model for corrosion in microelectronics, focusing on aluminum bondpads, which can be very beneficial for the design as well as the interpretation of reliability data of microelectronics.

A drawback of this interpretation of reliability, however, is that the ICC interprets group measures rather than individual measures.

Besides dealing with effective specific methods of probability calculation it reflects one school of thought with respect to the interpretation of structural reliability measures.

Measurement error can result from a variety of factors, including true variance not captured by a particular measurement strategy, which may complicate the interpretation of temporal reliability estimates.

Since the definitions of clinically acceptable Kappa and ICC values are both arbitrary and the Kappa statistics is very sensitive to the number of positive findings, the interpretation of the reliability of the tests will be based on all parameters in the analyses, including percentage agreement, Kappa/ICC values, measurement error and limits of agreement.

The clinical interpretation of reliability must involve the lower 95% CIs which further reflect the poor to moderate findings [ 33].

In addition, the interpretation of the resulting reliability coefficient depends on some strong assumptions being met: most notably in the context of the current study, there is the assumption that the measurement error of each item is random (i.e. uncorrelated with anything else).

This research also provides the first meta-analytic guidelines for the interpretation of single-item reliabilities in the context of personality assessment.

Therefore, we will calculate all recommended parameters from the 2×2 tables to allow full interpretation of reliability and agreement as related to the prevalence of concordant and discordant indications.

Regarding the interpretation of femoral anteversion, both the reliability coefficient value and the confidence intervals suggest that interpretation of this test's finding may not be consistent.

It was our aim to develop and validate the German version of the SIMP by Woods and Hampson (2005) and to provide first guidelines for the interpretation of the various single-item reliability approaches for the field of personality research.