Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The calculated atomic ratio of C (MWCNTs) and Cu or Ag NPs is consistent with the intake ratio of 1 1.
Similar(59)
59 Seelig et al 59 proposed that the increase of the Ca/Mg intake ratio from 2.0 in 1920s to over 3.0 in the USA contributed to a sharp rise in incidence of cardiovascular diseases in men, but not women, and that this ratio is continuously rising in recent years.
However, the mean intake of Mg 25 26 in East Asia 10 is equivalent to the US population 27 whereas the Ca/Mg intake ratio is almost halved in the Chinese population compared to the US population.
We found previously that the calcium/magnesium intake ratio modified the association between calcium intake and magnesium intake on the risk of colorectal adenoma [29].
Consistent with our hypothesis, the Ca/Mg intake ratio significantly modified the associations of intakes of Ca and Mg with mortality risk, whereas no significant interactions between Ca and Mg in relation to outcome were found.
In addition, the United States Department of Agriculture USDAA) food surveys from 1977 through 2008 showed a rise in the Ca Mg intake ratio, which coincided with the increased prevalence and incidence of type 2 diabetes [ 25].
By the early 1900s the omega 3 omega-6 intake ratio in the United States was estimated at 1 5, probably due to the high dietary content of corn oil products and corn-fed animals.
According to RDA for the elderly population above 65 years of age, the Ca Mg intake ratio ranges from 2.1 to 3.1 for men and from 2.4 to 4.1 for women [ 43– 43].
Dai et al. found that the Ca Mg intake ratio had significant modifying effects on CVD risks, when compared with the intakes of Mg or Ca alone [ 24].
It has been suggested that the Ca Mg intake ratio should not be >2.0 from both foods and supplements.
However, there are some inconsistent conclusions in prospective studies [ 15- 20], and the optimal intake ratio of n-3/n-6 PUFAs has not yet been well defined.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com