Sentence examples for the instruments presented from inspiring English sources
The rating of the instruments using the Hammill et al. (1992) criteria was undertaken by investigators who had not contributed in any manner to the development or psychometric testing of any of the instruments presented.
The authors therefore selected the instruments presented here because they were essentially tests of memory that were derived from knowledge gained through these translational efforts in neuroimaging, neuroscience, and clinical and experimental neuropsychology.
The methodology of interpretation of associations using positive and negative correlation to compare specific and generic quality of life questionnaires in cases in which the instruments presented inverse scales, by using the Spearman correlation test, has also been used in other studies, such as Santos et al. [ 30] and de Quadros Coelho et al. [ 39].
To solve this problem (assuming the separation of musical themes of longer duration), it is possible to use models of the instruments present in the mixture, or previously separated notes from the same source.
It is possible, however, that the instrument presented to the king of France by King Edward III of England in 1360 and called échiquier d'Angleterre was a dulce melos.
The instrument presented here can be used for simple, fast, and inexpensive in-line viscosity measurements.
It should be emphasized that the instrument presented satisfactory psychometric characteristics for the current sample (Fayers and Machin 2007).
However, they had to struggle with the conflations which the instrument presented, for example for the acceptance of micro- and macro-evolution.
The instrument presented a good linear fit with a coefficient of determination, R2 = 0.9993 in the peak area versus concentration calibration model.
The instrument presented here captures a wealth of information from a UTLC separation, and should provide insight into UTLC physics and improved analytical performance.
The instrument presented ideal linear curves for all the analytes with a coefficient of determination, R2 > 0.994, which is apparently more than the required value, 0.99 stipulated in the method validation guidelines for narcotic analysis (UNOD C2009).
