However, we do not review these individual methodologies here.
In this review, we first compare the pros and cons of individual methodologies (i.e., the natural and synthetic catabolism of microbes and the abiotic processes involving zero-valent irons, advanced oxidation processes, and small organic stimulants) for POP removal.
Different electronic systems in the study hospitals required individual methodologies to identify and capture data.
We then highlight recent trends in coupling the biotic abiotic methodologies and discuss how the processes are both feasible and superior to individual methodologies for POP cleanup.
While some individual methodologies (esp. neurocomputing) have gained much popularity during the past few years, the true benefit of soft computing lies on the integration of its constituent methodologies rather than use in isolation.
The important issues pertaining to different approaches, to make rational use of methodology, are discussed so that researcher and policymaker can understand the importance of individual methodology and its use in water resources management.
The most important lesson in methodology from our study is that the combination of genomics, physiology, systems biology, and computational analysis is capable of overcoming the shortcomings of each individual methodology when used in isolation and is able to produce viable results.
Means and 95%% confidence intervals (CI) for sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV and accuracy were calculated for each individual methodology.
Still, both effects are not automatic, but rather depend on specific factors and conditions within the design of the individual integrated scenario methodologies.
Although new historicists never went as far as poststructuralists like Roland Barthes or Michel Foucault, who essentially argued that works of literature are the product of social forces more than of the individual artist, the methodology did lean far enough in that direction for it to seem somewhat ironic for Greenblatt to turn to biography.
