Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The groups (study group n = 32; control group n = 30) did not differ with regard to age, height, body mass index, sex, or ASA classification.
In addition, the SAPS II score and recovery time were not statistically different between the groups (study group vs. placebo group; P > 0.05, study group vs. control group; P > 0.05, placebo group vs. control group; P > 0.05).
Similar(58)
Researchers devised a "jihadist scoring system" reviewed by three independent academics to determine whether jihadism was indeed the predominating motivation of the groups studied.
Eosinophil percentage was not significantly different among the groups studied.
Significant deviation from BTS guidelines can be seen throughout the groups studied.
Conflicting results from cytogenetic studies reflect the heterogeneity of the groups studied with regard to chemicals used and exposure conditions.
No lethality is noticed under any of the groups studied.
During treatment in the groups studied there were no thromboses.
However, no hypertrophy of organs was observed in this study amongst all the groups studied.
The immunoreactions for lipid peroxidation products in the neuropil were similar in the groups studied.
This enabled calculation of the Framingham score for all individuals within the groups studied.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com