When the framework is published in the spring, it should set out how health chiefs at local authorities will decide by whom, and in what circumstances, a patient's nursing care will be funded.
For all except WOTRO [unpublished data], however, the evaluations began before the studied versions of the frameworks were published.
As part of this, the Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework was published (UNISDR 2011) and the process was facilitated by the UNISDR Secretariat through a participatory approach involving stakeholders at international, regional, and national levels.
The new framework was published on the back of new WHO guidelines that recommended that patients start treatment earlier.
Also, given that the selected papers will not have been produced at the same time, it is likely that those papers produced after the EAPC framework was published (2009) will tend to achieve higher scores in the related section than those produced before; however keeping the main characteristics of the study design constant will ensure comparability of data to earlier or later framework.
The EFHIA Framework was published in Australia in 2004 and has subsequently been used in Australia and internationally [ 33– 35] and has informed the development of related approaches such as health equity impact assessment [ 28, 36, 37].
The initial Vanted framework was published in 2006 [ 4] and is widely used throughout the biologists community (see, for example, [ 5- 11]).
A different zinc redox-active framework was published the following year by Leong et al. in which electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements were able to show the photogeneration of the paramagnetic radical states of the material [100].
Since their framework was published, a handful of researchers have taken up their challenge [ 2- 8].
A first attempt to describe how to assess and compare scientific and societal quality of (health) research within one integrated framework was published by Van Ark and Klasen in 2007 [ 22].
