Exact(2)
Trialists from the former viewed the conduct of research much more positively and generally felt that they had the necessary resources available to conduct rigorous trials, while those from the latter reported greater levels of difficulty positioning their research as an important part of the clinical landscape.
Whereas the former viewed inter-organisational and inter-sectoral conflict as inherent and linked to historical and social forces, the latter anticipated that at some stage in the future (if the correct steps were followed, relationships built, groundwork done, knock-on effects mitigated and so on), they would be resolved.
Similar(58)
Libertarians endorse the former view, while the "republican" tradition, Pettit claims, has historically upheld the latter.
Miller reports that Pauli inclined to the former view, Jung the latter.
I've always taken the former view and so, clearly, does Bondy.
While the former view dominated most of the early responses to WikiLeaks, it seems excessively cheerful in retrospect.
Those who held the former view recognized that some notion of function or teleology generally was uniquely suitable to biology and not eliminable from it.
The former view radical actions of the early '70s as an almost necessary reaction to the times (and particularly to the war in Vietnam).
The prevailing orthodoxy is to take the former view – which is why contemporary artists celebrate this heritage in the modern works which use the techniques for pieces that wouldn't even be recognised as quilts by their predecessors.
Among those who take the former view, some say that morality depends upon religion in the way in which eating depends upon having an appetite: Religion provides the motivation that makes people behave morally.
The former view was shown to be correct in 1886, when two Neanderthal skeletons associated with Middle Paleolithic stone tools and bones of extinct animals were discovered in a cave at Spy, Belgium.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com