Sentence examples for the former table from inspiring English sources

This effect was evident for both non-widespread CMSCs and widespread CMSCs, but only significant for the former (Table 5).

It indicated that non-framework dealumination occurred on USY-E, while both non-framework and framework dealumination occurred on USY-C, leading to the higher crystallinity of USY-E than USY-C (Table 1. Similarly, the degree of non-framework dealumination of USY-EC is higher than USY-C, which results in higher crystallinity for the former (Table 1).

Kinetic analysis shows that Ala-Leu-Lys-AMC is a better substrate than Ala-Leu-Arg-AMC as the Km value was lower for the former (table 2).

Wijk06-14 was most likely younger than Wijk08-150, based on a lower number of growth marks and the absence of lamellar zonal bone in the former (Table S1).

Co-circulation of different viral genotypes in extremely low frequencies might be an indication of the former (Table 1).

We note that the latter effect, where full co-expression is expected, was stronger than the former (Table 3).

We have rewritten the manuscript with a more appropriate language and have removed unnecessary material as much as possible such as the former Tables of BLAST statistic included in the database (to show that the different HMMs and MRCs were tested).

Since Table 1 shows the original plant materials of this research, which cannot be omitted, we changed its appearance from the first table (former Table 1) into the last one (new Table 5).

At the other table, two former world champions had stopped in game, so the Schwartz team gained 13 international match points on the board.

The Hausdorff-like similarity is: Hs_{AB} = frac{{1 + left( {1 + 0.20 + 0.35} right)}}{1 + 3} = 0.64For the two examples above, if we applied the classical Hausdorff formula to measure the similarity between the sets, then we would obtain much lower similarity values, that is, 0.20 instead of 0.84 for the former example (Table 1) and 0.20 instead of 0.64 for the latter (Table 2).

For these two groups of firms, the table provides the median and average employment size in 3 years prior to firm shutdown in the former group Table 6 Growth comparison of shutting down and continuing firms   Shutting down in t   Continuing in t   Mean Median   Mean Median   t/t−1 t−1/t−2 t−2/t−3 t/t−1 t−1/t−2 t−2/t−3   t/t−1 t−1/t−2 t−2/t−3 t/t−1 t−1/t−2 t−2/t−3 Crops and animal prod.