Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
The former lists were organically generated and commonly gamed (see above).
Similar(59)
Threads in the former list are eligible for execution, while threads in the latter list are not.
The former list includes the three ostensible Oscar front-runners: "La La Land," "Moonlight" and "Manchester by the Sea". .
In the former list, only 22 genes are in common with the signature reported in [ 16].
Genes annotated in this pathway were matched to the former list of genes with │Δβ│>0.2.
Pregnancies with conditions in the former list were classed as 'high-risk', and those with conditions in the latter list as 'medium-risk'.
Specifically, the former list sorts features according to their contributions to the classification (i.e., only considering the criterion of max-relevance), while the latter list sorts features by considering both the max-relevance and min-redundancy criteria.
Of the candidate gene lists derived from the comparison of 4-/4+ and 1-/4- tumors, 44.7% (671) of the former list and 29.6% (107) of the latter were supported by prior evidence of alternative splicing.
We therefore added only five internationally acknowledged indicators to the former list of 24 indicators: "patient satisfaction", "kindness of staff", "distance to place of living", "recommendation by relatives or physicians", and "hospital regularly visited or referred to".
This is an expansion of the former listing of medical schools [ 38], building a wider database that also will include training institutions for other health professions such as nursing, dentistry and pharmacy.
In the former list, are included HBB (hemoglobin β chain), H3F3A histoneone, family 3A, MED6 (mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription, subunit 6 homolog), FTL (ferritin, light polypeptide), ACTG1 (actin, gamma 1), B2M (β-2-microglobulin) several HLA-related genes, several hemoglobin-related genes, S100A9 (S100 calcium binding protein A9 calgranulin B).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com