Sentence examples for the former arguments from inspiring English sources

The former arguments are plainly theoretical: they appeal to the explanatory power of semantical theories invoking propositions.

We recently published [24, 25]; the former arguments that mobility models have a relevant effect on the properties of the proposed algorithms, while the latter is a short contribution on the possibility to leverage network mobility for node capture detection.

The former arguments take the position that forced displacement is not in itself illegal, and the latter takes the position that forced displacement is illegal unless it can be proven that an exception of 'imperative military reasons' or 'civilian security' applies.

It would appear that the former argument was prevalent.

The former argument was outlined by the prosecution QC, Sasha Wass, in a devastating opening speech which surmised that Adoboli's potential losses were at one point big enough to sink UBS.

In rejecting the former argument, the court accepted the basic premise of the act's opponents – namely, that rather than regulating the conduct of individuals already in market (in this case, for healthcare), the act instead sought to push people into the market for insurance, thereby overstepping the boundaries of its constitutional limits of power.

A short report published by the Cologne Institute for Economic Research in 2016 finds evidence in support of the former argument (Bergmann et al. 2016).

A second argument, which proceeds from the conclusion to the former argument, aims to show that reason "can never oppose passion in the direction of the will" (T 413).

Responding to the former argument, Christakis and Fowler say they found that happy and unhappy people still become friends, but that--over time--the mood of one evolves to match the other.

Opponents of the former argument scoff at the idea that normal humans morph into bloodthirsty cutthroats after a few hours on a console, while some lawmakers despise the namby-pamby mob who lays society's shortcomings at its own door.

According to the former argument, at least some property rights can be justified by showing that a scheme allowing appropriation of property without consent has beneficial consequences for the preservation of mankind.