Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(13)
The foregoing argument makes essential use of collapse.
The foregoing argument incorporates deontological and consequentialist considerations.
Rupert (2001) has a lengthy reply to the foregoing argument.
Graham Oppy (2003) suggests a way to defeat the foregoing argument.
In order to do this, the foregoing argument for coherentism must be supplemented.
From a utilitarian point of view, however, the foregoing argument for the enactment of some form of social minimum is not conclusive.
Similar(47)
Repeating the foregoing arguments, we obtain (b - d).
Thus, repeating the foregoing arguments, one obtains two sequences and such that.
From the foregoing arguments, we infer that the operator (N x,y)) is completely continuous by the Arzelá-Ascoli theorem.
The foregoing arguments from Kripke lead to the conclusion that the relevant kinds are not characterized of necessity by the readily observable properties of their instances.
As 0 < σ < 1, therefore, in view of the foregoing arguments, at t 0 = 1, we have 0 < α ( 1 ) − β ( 1 ) ≤ g − g ≤ L 3 σ n − 1 ( σ n − 1 α − σ n − 1 β ≤ 0, 0 < σ < 1, which is a contradiction. This completes the proof. □. Theorem 3.1 Assume that.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com