Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
So, the first relation of (3.4) holds.
Suppose that (3.5), the first relation of (3.2) and the second relation of (3.8) are satisfied.
In addition, the first relation of (3.4) directly yields that H ⊂ H 00 ∗.
It follows from the first relation of (7) that | a j β | < 1, 1 ≤ j ≤ k + 1.
end{aligned} (37) If we substitute the results of equations (36) and (37) in the equality (33), we obtain the first relation of Theorem 2, namely equation (28).
By Remark 3.1, H = ( H 00 J ∗. So, by the first relation of (3.8), x ( t ) = 0 for t ∈ I implies that f ( t ) = 0 for t ∈ I.
Similar(49)
It follows from (8) and the second relation of condition (7) that all the eigenvalues of D F ( O ) have absolute values larger than 1 in norm.
The substitution of the first relation (2.12). in the second of (2.11) gives (2.13).
With the third relation the clogging ability of the biomass was strongly underestimated.
The second relation exists between gain of chromosome 17q and the gain on the opposing chromosome arm.
By the definition of, the second relation in (4.23), and, we get (425).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com