Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(19)
The first predictor function was designed to capture sustained activations during routine responding and consisted of the onset and duration times for all frequent and infrequent trials convolved with the canonical haemodynamic response function (HRF).
The first predictor was used to identify the causal effect of friends.
Disturbance intensity DIST remains, by far, the first predictor of the post-disturbance system trajectory (Fig. 1).
(8) In the cases where the first predictor (equation (3)) fails, then equations (4) and (8) describe the second predictor, a system of two first-order equations.
The first predictor is applied to the general form (1), whereas the second predictor is applied to the canonical form (5) after the first predictor has returned negative results (or to the general form (1) with (b= 0) or (b=2/(x+C)), where C is a constant).
For instance, for an arm movement of 25°, the first predictor received the desired angular velocity for this movement and then computed the corresponded desired force for each muscles which represented the output signal of this first predictor.
Similar(39)
In 2002, LOCkey (Nair & Rost, 2002a), one of the first predictors of this class, was reported with a remarkable precision of 82%, albeit with a sensitivity of <50%, presumably due in part to a lack of existing functional annotations.
The second predictor function was designed to capture transient increases in activation in response to infrequent trials.
Species composition of the beetles was also best predicted by area of oak woodland key habitat within 1 km, with canopy closure as the second predictor.
The second predictor takes an analytically tractable form in the cases where the original equation (1) is already in canonical form ((b=0)) and for (b(x)=2/(x+C)), where C is an arbitrary constant.
As previously reported [17] [18], co-morbidity requiring treatment constitutes the fourth predictor for 90-day mortality.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com