In the first case, much information at the population and metapopulation level will be obtainable, but the information per individual will be quite limited.
For the first case, the information reaches the node exactly at the time (f_a u_j,v_j)).
In the first case, this information is extracted from labels of tones and break indices, as proposed in the Tones and Break Index (ToBI) system [20].
In the first case, visual information is obtained via peripheral vision while in the second case the sample dots are foveated and additionally encoded by central vision.
In the first case, the profile information is transformed into a gene similarity network, where the strength of a link between two genes represents the global similarity of their profiles (Pei et al., 2005; Segal et al., 2003; Ulitsky and Shamir, 2007).
This is not the first case in which autopsy information that paints the victim in a poor light is given to the media.
In the first case, the amount of information flowing through the communication channel changes from ~0, when the probability of expression of the ERF1 gene is close to 0.5 and the amount of the ERF1 protein inside the nucleus is ~1.7 nM, to a value ~0.5 mers when ≈ 1 and the amount of ERF1 protein inside the nucleus is ~3 nM.
In the first case, users have to remember information and recall it as they use the app.
In the first case, XRF spectra reflected the information on elemental composition of only the lower painting excluding the necessity to isolate the signal from the upper painting.
In the first case study, by using OVA-specific T-epitope informandon and mouse strain-specific MHC alleles, the simulated kinetics for T cell and plasma cell are in reasonable agreement with the experimental data, provided two parameters (whose values could not be obtained from the literature) are adjusted.
