Good agreement among the responses was observed for the first and second example presented in this study.
As the required time to obtain an optimal solution from true Pareto front by GAMS is too long for the first and second example, to save computation effort each run is interrupted on a predetermined time and the solution obtained so far is reported.
We will study the finite sample behaviour of our tests for unit root versions of the first and third examples in Sects.
The main difference between the first and third example is that the former contains three planning periods and six locations.
The first and third case examples are presented briefly: the first because of its relative simplicity; the third because of its relative complexity.
This capability is demonstrated in the third and fourth examples through the comparisons with the peer research outcomes.
The third and fourth examples are given from flickering of 9 Hz between time points 10.4 and 12.2 s and time points 4.7 and 5.7 s, respectively.
The third and fourth examples depict individuals with moderate concern about STIs/pregnancy and use condoms depending on relationship and event circumstances.
The first example uses an intraclass correlation between two different measures as the estimate of reliability, while the second and third examples use Cronbach's alpha to judge reliability.
The third and fourth examples show the results of IsoCleft Finder from our collaboration with the Joint Center for Structural Genomics that were used to support the functional annotation of the proteins in question.
