Surprisingly, however, in the context of chromatin, S10ph did not stimulate acetylation by the SAGA complex (which contains GCN5), suggesting that other subunits override the expected preference.
As was expected, preferences for the health states decreased with reduced treatment responsiveness and with increasing grade of treatment-related toxicity.
As expected, preferences were constrained under the 9 treatments, resulting in a lower selectivity index compared to preference (Table 2).
As might be expected, preferences for outpatient priming increased when women could return to their own home, and decreased with more trips to hospital and longer travel time.
As may be expected, preferences for health states decreased with reduced treatment responsiveness and with an increasing grade of treatment-related toxicity.
As expected, preferences for treatment response states (i.e., complete remission or complete remission with partial hematological recovery) were substantially higher than for progressive disease, and decreased logically with increasing disease severity.
The choice between these two models critically depends on expectations about the variation of preferences [39]: if researchers expect preferences to vary greatly between individuals, the MXL is preferred; the LCM is preferred if individuals are thought to be grouped in homogeneous latent groups.
Finally the expected value preference relations are defined to transform the interval collective preference relation to a crisp one and the weights of alternatives are obtained from the expected value preference relations.
The results (Fig. 7B, Table 2) clearly showed the expected gRNA targeting preferences.
Notably, this ipsilateral pattern of effects reverted to the expected contralateral response preference in the univariate analysis of the follow-up experiment, even though left right head turn classification in early visual cortex was significant in both the original and the follow-up experiments.
