the evidence for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "the evidence for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing support or justification for a claim, argument, or theory. Example: "The evidence for climate change is overwhelming, with numerous studies supporting the increase in global temperatures."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The evidence for that?

The New York Times

The evidence for this, though, is equivocal.

The Economist

Yet the evidence for this is mixed.

The Economist

But the evidence for this is slim.

The Economist

The evidence for this is shaky.

The Economist

Where is the evidence for that claim?

The New York Times

The evidence for this is pretty flimsy.

The Economist

What's the evidence for these statements?

The New Yorker

What's the evidence for that?

The New York Times

What's the evidence for this?

The Washington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

But what's the evidence for that?

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "the evidence for", clearly specify what the evidence is supporting. Avoid vague statements; provide concrete details to strengthen your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "the evidence for" when the evidence is weak or inconclusive. Instead, use phrases like "there is some evidence to suggest" or "limited evidence exists".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "the evidence for" functions as a noun phrase acting as a subject or object complement, often introducing or referring to supporting information. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is correct and usable. Examples show it introducing evidence for a claim, theory, or action.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Academia

21%

Science

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "the evidence for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to introduce supporting information for a claim or argument. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it’s a correct and applicable phrase. It appears most often in news, academic, and scientific contexts, signifying a neutral to formal register. Related phrases include "the proof for", "the basis for", and "the support for", each carrying slightly different nuances. When using this phrase, remember to provide clear and specific details to strengthen your argument and avoid overstating the strength of the evidence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the proof for

Replaces "evidence" with "proof", suggesting a higher degree of certainty.

the basis for

Focuses on the foundational aspect of the evidence.

the support for

Emphasizes the act of providing backing or justification.

the justification for

Highlights the act of demonstrating something to be right or reasonable.

the rationale for

Emphasizes the reasoning behind something.

the grounds for

Indicates the basis or reason for an action or belief.

the argument for

Focuses on presenting a case or reasoned claim.

the case for

Similar to "argument", but can also refer to assembled facts.

the data supporting

Specifically refers to factual information that backs up a claim.

what supports

Asks directly for the thing which provides support.

FAQs

How can I use "the evidence for" in a sentence?

Use "the evidence for" to introduce the supporting facts or information related to a claim. For example, "The evidence for climate change is overwhelming" or "What is "the evidence for that claim"?".

What are some alternatives to "the evidence for"?

You can use phrases like "the proof for", "the basis for", or "the support for" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When should I use "the evidence for" versus "the evidence of"?

"The evidence for" is used to support a claim or idea. "The evidence of" indicates proof that something exists or has occurred. For example, "the evidence for evolution" versus "the evidence of a crime".

Is it better to use "the evidence for" or "evidence supporting"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "the evidence for" is generally used to introduce a broader discussion of supporting facts, whereas "evidence supporting" is used as a modifier. For example, "the evidence for the theory" versus "evidence supporting the theory".