Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
The performances of the element are evaluated from comparisons with harmonic responses of plates obtained by the finite element method.
The element is evaluated for its accuracy in the analysis of the stability and vibration of anisotropic rectangular plates with different lamination schemes and boudary conditions.
Using the ANSYS platform, the performance of the element was evaluated by comparing the predicted results with those obtained using mixed quadratic tetrahedral elements and hexahedral elements with a B-bar formulation.
The precision of the float-sink experiment and the determination of the trace elements were evaluated by balancing the trace element content between the raw coal and the weighted mean values in the products of different densities in the float-sink experiments and in the fines of particle size less than 0.5 mm.
The precisions of the float-sink experiments and the determination of the trace elements were evaluated by balancing the trace elements concentration of the raw coal and the weighted mean values in the products of different densities in float-sink experiments and in fines of particle size less than 0.5 mm.
The twin boundary segregation probabilities of the alloying elements were evaluated, considering both migration and segregation ability of randomly distributed solutes into twin boundaries.
The architectural elements were evaluated both as a whole and through single details.
The shear strength of these elements is evaluated at various stages of loading and can be computed by direct simple expressions.
Two refinements of Galerkin's method on finite elements were evaluated for the solution of population balance equations for precipitation systems.
Differences in parameters between psychrophile and mesophile proteins within clusters and secondary structure elements were evaluated using the Wilcox test.
The secular variations of the orbital elements are evaluated from the orbital positions propagated for a half year.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com