The effective coverage of antimicrobials for all of the infectious agents found in each positive ascitic fluid culture is shown in Table 2.
Overall, our observation that is that the effective coverage of Affymetrix Human arrays for detecting differential expression (using both PM-only and PM and MM based filtering methods) is less than that of Affymetrix Porcine arrays.
A central hypothesis of this strategy is that enhancing interactions between frontline workers and mothers and families is critical for increasing the effective coverage of life-saving interventions.
Beyond the selection of indicators at the facilities level, guidance is needed for utilizing and analyzing health systems benchmark data collected prior to the emergency, and for calculating the effective coverage of essential health services and core health systems indicators.
Overall this gives rise to the eight possible options listed: the vaccination schedules for each of these options are contained in Additional file 1 Figure 3 shows the effective coverage over time for Pertussis and Tetanus, both for the current programme and Option 2 (the alternative feasible schedule for the current set of diseases).
Therefore we developed a simple method to estimate the effective coverage that would be achieved for each disease included in a given vaccination programme among a cohort of children at each month over the first five years of life.
A novel framework for estimating the effective coverage against all of the diseases within a vaccination programme was developed.
Thus, as the error rate goes up, the effective coverage goes down, and the evidence for the duplications gets weaker, which results in fewer predictions and hence fewer true positives.
We have developed a novel framework for estimating the effective coverage that would be achieved against each disease included in a given childhood immunisation schedule and applied this within the context of the UK vaccination programme.
For pertussis, the effective coverage is always lower in schedule Option 2 than in the current programme because, despite the earlier booster in option 2 resulting in higher uptake of the booster, the vaccine efficacy of the Pediacel booster (Option 2) is quite a bit lower than for Repevax/Infanrix IPV.
