the document was reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "the document was reviewed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating that a document has undergone examination or assessment by someone. Example: "After the revisions were made, the document was reviewed by the legal team for compliance."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The document was reviewed and summarized in a data collection sheet that included the title of the document and the data related to the four domains for assessing efforts to link research to action framework.

Health Research Policy and Systems

The document was reviewed and approved by the American Diabetes Association's Professional Practice Committee in October 2012 and approved by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors in November 2012 and was reviewed and approved by The Endocrine Society's Clinical Affairs Core Committee in October 2012 and by Council in November 2012.

Diabetes Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Following approval by the group, this document was reviewed and approved during a cabinet meeting before distribution as a technical cluster note to all WHO members.

Health Research Policy and Systems

"The documents were reviewed by F.D.L.E., as well as the Florida Division of Elections.

The New York Times

The documents were reviewed by a group of agency analysts who compared the material with reports already logged into data bases in Oklahoma City.

The New York Times

The documents were reviewed, the White House said, by Albert C. Lloyd, a retired lieutenant colonel in the Guard who assisted the Bush campaign in releasing Mr. Bush's records in 2000.

The New York Times

About 80% of it has so far been scanned, and the digital versions of the documents are reviewed by a senior analyst to determine which should be translated into English for broader scrutiny.

The Guardian

The Memphis Police Department required a Tennessee resident to file the records request, then asked for $3,300 unless the documents were reviewed in person at police headquarters.

Vice

As the documents were reviewed, they were mapped in terms of their direct contribution to the measurement of indicators and interpretation of results, and in terms of identification for key informants, evaluation questions and research tools.

Unicef

Over the course of 2 two-hour meetings, the synthesis document was reviewed in detail.

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

A translation of the new Iraqi document was reviewed by a Pentagon working group in the spring, officials said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "the document was reviewed", ensure clarity about who performed the review and what criteria were used. This adds credibility and context to your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "the document was reviewed" without specifying who conducted the review. This omission can create ambiguity and weaken the impact of your statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "the document was reviewed" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a document has been subjected to examination or assessment. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

65%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "the document was reviewed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate that a document has undergone examination or assessment. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and appropriate for use in written English. While versatile across various contexts, it is particularly prevalent in scientific, news, and formal business settings. To enhance clarity, it is advisable to specify who conducted the review and its purpose. For alternative phrasing, consider "the document underwent review" or "the document was examined". By following best practices and avoiding common errors, you can effectively use this phrase in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the document underwent review

This alternative uses 'underwent' to emphasize the process the document experienced.

the document was examined

“Examined” suggests a close and careful inspection of the document.

the document was inspected

“Inspected” implies a formal or official examination of the document.

the document was assessed

“Assessed” suggests an evaluation of the document's quality or value.

the document was checked

“Checked” implies a verification of the document for accuracy or completeness.

the document was scrutinized

“Scrutinized” indicates a thorough and critical examination of the document.

the document was audited

“Audited” suggests an official examination of the document, typically for financial or compliance purposes.

the review of the document was conducted

This alternative emphasizes the action of reviewing rather than the document itself.

the document was analyzed

“Analyzed” suggests a detailed examination to understand the document's content or structure.

the document received a review

This alternative emphasizes that the document was the recipient of the review process.

FAQs

What is another way to say "the document was reviewed"?

You can use alternatives like "the document underwent review", "the document was examined", or "the document was assessed" depending on the context.

How can I make the phrase "the document was reviewed" more specific?

To be more specific, include who reviewed the document (e.g., "the legal team reviewed the document") and/or the purpose of the review (e.g., "the document was reviewed for compliance").

Is it better to use active or passive voice when saying a document was reviewed?

While "the document was reviewed" is grammatically correct, using the active voice (e.g., "the committee reviewed the document") can be more direct and informative.

What's the difference between "the document was reviewed" and "the document was revised"?

"The document was reviewed" means it was examined, while "the document was revised" means it was changed or updated. A review may lead to revisions.