Experimental results show that the new document scoring model well reflects the terms proximity, and the new document scoring scheme ScoreComp, combined with interval scoring, is more sensitive than scheme FreqComp combined with interval scoring.
Interrater consistency was assessed by agreement in weighted Kappa score for the total document score (scale 1 5) for all three predefined criteria lists at pre- and post-test.
This new field weights reflect the terms proximity and can be used to calculate document scoring for terms retrieval.
Most works on structured document retrieval treat the combination of field scores, but it is hard to determine the field weights before the formation of document score.
For each label (l_i in L), calculate the label-oriented document score: begin{aligned} s_{text {LOD}} t,l_i) =&displaystyle frac{1}{n_{t}} times displaystyle sum _{x in t}s_{text {LOT}} x,l_i) * tf x,t).
The label whose label-oriented document score is the highest will be assigned to the text t.
Based on domain ontology, the semantics of a document are represented by a graph (called Document Semantic Network) and, then, proposed relation-based weighting schemes are used to evaluate the graph to calculate the document relevance score.
The report documents scores of incidents where unarmed protesters were killed, often by snipers shooting from nearby buildings or, according to multiple witnesses, from helicopters flying overhead.
Those who were told the document had been secret scored the decision, on average, as an 8.2.
Predictably, it tried to exploit America's snatching of the documents to score points by hinting that it might have tampered with them to its advantage.
