From the compilation of data presented in Figure 1, the discussion referred to some important questions.
With respect to quality of the endeavour even Einstein was mentioned in the discussion, referring to the quote " Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler"., in this case freely translated into " Simplify as much as possible, but not further".
At the end of METHODS subsection 3, the authors state: "The two approaches used in Model 1 and 2 were comparatively analyzed and produced similar results (ref. to the end of sub-section 5)" The discussion referred to by the authors I found far too cursory and unconvincing, especially given the importance of the issue.
He regretted the "language and tone" adopted in the telephone calls, but maintained that the discussions referred to "an envisaged emergency liquidity transaction that did not take place".
The above discussion refers to the response of the mesophase to precipitant components.
And note: While the following discussion refers to a single parent who lives alone, many of the considerations would also apply to an elderly couple who are each in declining health.
We interchangeably refer to CNV and cCNV regions in the remainder of the text - all discussion refers to the CNV obtained as a result of combining CNV regions from FREEC configurations, i.e. one should consider all CNV references to be cCNV.
Our discussion refers to the general principle of segregation, although it will be an important research endeavor to examine which specific dimensions of segregation are related to environmental health disparities.
Far more serious is a blatant mistranslation in a discussion referring to the famous collegium that performed in Gottfried Zimmermann's coffeehouse in Leipzig.
All subsequent results and discussion refer to the parsimony ratchet analyses.
