Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Table 2 shows the sum-scores in the dimensions of study-related behaviour and experience of the medical students compared to the STEM students at baseline.
The dimensions of the study (sample size: 200 patients) allow us to make recommendations.
Concurrent validity was assessed by analyzing Pearson correlation coefficients between the dimensions of the study questionnaire and those of another questionnaire measuring similar concepts.
The outcomes of two of the dimensions of this study, GS versus BLUP and CAND versus SIB are driven by the increased accuracy of estimation of Mendelian sampling terms.
When ordering online, all good stores will give you the dimensions of the study table.
Dimension 1 Dimension 2 Dimension 3 NHR-A ** 0.11 0.73** N 0.26 0.04 0.84** Table 12 Correlation coefficients between the perceptual dimensions of study C and the best-correlated psychoacoustic descriptors.
Dimension 1 Dimension 2 Dimension 3 Roughness 0.3 Spectral centroid 0.0 0.1 Spectral deviation 0.3 Table 13 Correlation coefficients between the perceptual dimensions of study D and acoustic features.
Dimension 1 Dimension 2 Dimension 3 RAPmv-A ** 0.32 CGg-ERB 0.35 ** Dec 266 23000.00.00 ** Table 10 Correlation coefficients between the perceptual dimensions of study A2 and acoustic features.
Dimension 1 Dimension 2 rad-2N/0.5N 0.93** CGg-C 0.86** Table 11 Correlation coefficients between the perceptual dimensions of study B and acoustic features.
Minimum recall number 57 Minimum recall percentage 90.5% Maximum recall number 63 Maximum recall percentage 100% Recall number standard deviation 1.3 Mean recall number 60.4 Mean recall percentage 95.9% Mean recall percentage interval 93.8%–97.9% Table 9 Correlation coefficients between the perceptual dimensions of study A1 and psychoacoustic descriptors.
Specifically, we considered the year of publication, where 2010 was taken as a reference, the dimension of the study, and gender proportion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com