Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
One way ANOVA analysis revealed that a significant difference exists between the different extracts (F = 349.97; P < 0.05).
Next, Wilbur and Heald use a candidate approach to attempt to discover which cytoplasmic factors are responsible for the differing rates of microtubule catastrophies in the different extracts.
The different extracts were reconstituted in their various extraction solvents to give the required concentrations needed in this study.
The significant differences for free radical scavenging activity among the different extracts may be attributed to the varied quantity of each of the phytochemical contents of the plant.
The differences in the molecular composition and diversity of SOM in the different extracts were more evident in surface soils and declined with depth, and were consistent with higher SOC and total N concentrations under elevated than ambient [CO2].
Presence of glycosylphosphatidylinositol and glycosphingolipid structures was determined in the different extracts.
The quantification of ryanodol in the different extracts was accomplished using HPLC MS.
There were small variations in chemical shift among the different extracts (Table 2).
The calculated values of R p in 1 M NaOH solution with the different extracts are shown in Table 3.
It was found that the different extracts act as a good corrosion inhibitor for the tested system.
Natural products constitute an important source of new drugs, and design and implementation of antimycobacterial susceptibility testing methods are necessary to evaluate the different extracts and compounds.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com