Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Most patients confirmed that SSTS was easy to use, and reported no difficulty in understanding how to use the device (Table 3).
Although most of the volunteers were technologically naïve, 79% reported having no technical problems with the device (Table 2).
In order to maintain the same test procedures, both examinations were performed by the same researcher in the same conditions with identical procedures and parameters of the device (Table 1).
Similar(57)
Insertion success rate on the first attempt varied between the devices (Table 2).
At the post treatment assessment, the groups were significantly different (with small to medium effect sizes) when the treatment group was wearing the FES device (Table 4).
The parameters improved after placement of the NPT device (Table 1).
Importantly, false-negative results were predominantly attributable to the lack of spectral Doppler capability of the portable device (Table 1).
In addition, the percentage of time >50 cm H2O cuff pressure was significantly lower in piglets with the pneumatic device than in piglets without the pneumatic device (Table 1).
However, 5 of the same 9 individuals could produce a positive result using the Good Strength device (Table 3).
The newly designed instrument also shortened operating time by 11.5 minutes compared to the standard device (Table 1).
PIF, maximum change in pressure (∆P) and inhalation volume (IV) were significantly higher with Spiromax than with the Turbuhaler device (Table 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com