Sentence examples for the decrease in motor from inspiring English sources

The decrease in motor vehicle exports happened earlier than soybeans and oil because BMW was responding to not just the trade war with China but also Trump's decision to impose tariffs on steel imports.

The decrease in motor performance observed between FT1 and FT2 (Fig. 4B) was significantly smaller in Group 6 compared to Group 1 (t = 3.291, p = 0.003) with no differences between Group 6 and Group 2 (t = 0.921, p = 0.83) or between Group 6 and Group 9 (t = 0.42, p = 0.89).

The increase in hanging also appears greater than the decrease in motor vehicle exhaust deaths.

It seems likely that the decrease in motor vehicle exhaust fume deaths was related to the introduction of catalytic converters.

The time course of this decrease in motor performance indicates that decreased motor performance occurs subsequent to the decrease in grip strength, suggesting that muscle weakness precedes impaired musculoskeletal function associated with diet-induced obesity in mice.

Across healthy participants, those who had the greatest increase in velocity also had the greatest decrease in motor variability, indicating stronger motivational effects (r = 0.23, p = 0.001; Figure S4A).

Intriguingly, the reorganization of HVC-RA synapses we observed experimentally was sufficient to explain the developmental decrease in motor variability seen in vivo (Ölveczky et al., 2011).

The observed decrease in motor performance from an early age suggests that any mitochondrial defects in ref(2 P mutants might preferentially affect tissues with high energetic demand such as the skeletal muscles and spermatids.

Although the relative increase in expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress markers in AR100 spinal cord compared to wild-type control tissue reduced with disease progression, it is likely that this may reflect the progressive decrease in motor neuron survival in AR100 mice as they age.

Between FT1 and FTII the decrease in Group 9 motor performance was significantly different from Group 1 (t = 3.287, p = 0.003) but not Group 2 (t = 0.94, p = 0.93).

Future research, however, is warranted to investigate the clinical aspect related to decrease in motor performance.