Sentence examples for the datasets were compared from inspiring English sources

Datasets tissue source and raw number of sequence reads are summarized in Additional file 1 and Additional file 2. The raw reads of the datasets were compared with all miRNA sequences from miRBase v17 at http://www.mirbase.org[ 13] using SHRiMP2 [ 14] as the mapping tool.

This result was consistent when the datasets were compared between time points, with ∼50% of mid-bloom transcripts being homologous with ∼90% of post-bloom transcripts (Table S3).

The orientations of the first PC axes derived from each of the datasets were compared directly, but axes subsequent to PC1 could not be examined individually.

The datasets were compared across treatment groups and time of measurement using the ANOVA procedure.

Then all the Rab groups in the datasets were compared with each other for redundancy at sequence level.

When the datasets were compared, several discrepancies occurred with regard to the organization and the performance of generalist palliative care.

Unfortunately, some of this poor agreement might be due to temporal changes in the Black Sea, because the datasets being compared were not obtained contemporaneously.

The numbers of detected time series from the datasets are compared to evaluate the robustness of the methods against noise.

Here, x ¯ refers to the median distance of all observations in region R across the datasets being compared.

It could be argued that the exposed surface occupied by positively selected amino acid sites is the same in the datasets being compared, but that in some datasets not all positively selected amino acid sites were identified.

In addition to manual comparison of relative populations between the samples putative mRNA-tag dataset and genomic sequence from the same site, these datasets were compared statistically using the method described in[43] (Table S9 in SI).