Exact(4)
First, 500 ligatures of the dataset were selected for conducting these experiments.
Example(s) from the dataset were selected that best illustrate the category.
All cases of PBC first recorded at least one year after entry to the dataset were selected along with up to 10 controls matched for age, sex.
A subset of 83 query proteins belonging to the four main SCOP categories with certain features such as having the sequence identity of less than 10%, without missing residues and having at least two family members in the dataset, were selected and subtracted from the dataset (additional details about the dataset are available at Lo et al. [ 22]).
Similar(56)
The dataset is selected in the first wizard step (see Figure 2).
To create the first series in the benchmark, the first assay in the dataset was selected and an attempt was made to find a set of 5 molecules whose activities differ by at least 0.38 log units (this attempt involved iterating randomly over all possible selections of 5 molecules from the assay several thousand times).
A reduced subset of the 800 genes in the dataset was selected using the genefilter R package, as described previously, giving a subset of 40 genes that were analysed using our method.
At the lower left corner of Fig. 1B, two genes tauA (b0365) and tauB (b0366), which might be related to gene cysN (b2751) in the dataset are selected to apply the scatter plotting.
Each protein in the dataset was selected to have the highest annotated domain coverage and the highest number of protein chains within its homology class, while setting an upper bound of 20 protein chains for oligomeric protein complexes.
The variables that describe the dataset are selected based on the rules derived from this study: (i) ER targeting sequence (ii) sub-cellular location, (iii) secondary structure and (iv) exposed/buried.
The dataset was selected to include all grades of lateral JSN (n = 25 knees per lateral JSN grade) and knees with and without lateral JSN progression (JSN grade change between baseline and follow-up visit).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com