Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
The data were normalized using quantile normalization (BOLSTAD http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12538238).nih.gov/pubmed/12538238
The data were normalized using quantile normalization, and expression measures were produced by fitting the RMA robust linear model.
The data were normalized using TMM normalization, implemented through the edgeR package in R (Robinson and Oshlack 2010).
The data were normalized using quantile normalization with the RMA algorithm for gene-level intensities and the ratio determined for each gene using Partek Genomics Suite (Partek Inc., St . Louis MO, USA).
The data were normalized using the default normalization method.
The data were normalized using the LOWESS normalization algorithm within JMP Genomics.
The data were normalized using Lowess print-tip normalization as described previously [ 19].
The data were normalized using subset-quantile within array normalization (SWAN) [ 52], and potential batch effects were removed using ComBat [ 53].
The data were normalized using robust multi-array average (RMA) normalization.
The data were normalized using per spot and per chip LOWESS normalization.
The proteomic data are presented as weighted averages of the ratios of the relevant peptides (ratio calculated with respect to the reference standard) as described, and the data were normalized using the applied bias with β-actin as a normalizing factor.
More suggestions(16)
the data were obtained using
the data were acquired using
the libraries were normalized using
the data were assessed using
the gels were normalized using
the counts were normalized using
the data were analysed using
the microarrays were normalized using
the data were collected using
the data were performed using
the data were calculated using
the data were elaborated using
the samples were normalized using
the data were analyzed using
the values were normalized using
the data were normalized according
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com