Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
Among the targets in their regulation-cutting cross hairs are environmental protection regulations — they want to beat back impending readjustments of the current ozone standards and regulations on coal ash — and some components of the Obama health care law, which the House voted earlier this year to repeal.
"EPA is proposing to adopt new standards that could be nearly impossible to meet, especially for areas of the country still struggling to comply with the current ozone standard".
In 2003, all 15 conurbations were in breach of the current ozone air quality objective, with more than 10 days of exceedences of this value.
Using national air monitor data and published C-R functions, we estimated health benefits from compliance with the current ozone NAAQS and potential benefits from adopting stricter ozone standards.
The goal of our analysis was to estimate the health benefits that would be achieved by meeting the current ozone NAAQS, and additional benefits that might accrue from meeting more stringent standards.
During the 2000 2002 time period, between 36 and 56% of ozone monitors each year in the United States failed to meet the current ozone standard of 80 ppb for the fourth highest maximum 8-hr ozone concentration.
Similar(54)
Using a careful scientist's guarded language, Smith concludes, "I wouldn't completely dismiss the possibility" that current ozone levels kill people prematurely, but "I'm not very confident" that they do.
It would also have cost polluters and government up to $90 billion per year a toll that, in hard times, Mr Obama felt unable to levy.His proxies also argued that, as the current legal ozone limit 75 parts per billion—was up for review in 2013, it anyway made sense to delay reducing it.
By then, relative annual Arctic losses would be worse than in the current Antarctic ozone hole.
As discussed above, this heatwave period contributed to breaches of the current UK ozone air quality objective at this site and all population centres in this study.
The goal of the present analysis was to evaluate immediate health benefits that would result at nationwide and regional levels from meeting the current NAAQS ozone standard of 75 ppb, and two more stringent standards of 70 and 60 ppb.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com