Sentence examples for the corresponding thesis from inspiring English sources

Smets (2002) tries to justify the corresponding thesis for DS belief functions.

The corresponding thesis for decision problems holds that a problem is feasibly decidable just in case it is in the class \ \textbf{P}\).

Those seeking to resist the challenge that one or more of these views poses to traditional cognitive science have two primary options: to deny the truth of the corresponding thesis, or to reject the inference(s) from that thesis to claims about what traditional cognitive science can and cannot explain.

So their claims about what we have reasons to do are checked by the plausibility of the corresponding theses about what is valuable.

The truth of this normative thesis, however, simply does not follow from the corresponding descriptive thesis.

The corresponding general thesis does not hold for parts, however.

The result of applying the premises is a firm list (contested, of course, by others) of ten theses held by Socrates, all of which are incompatible with the corresponding ten theses held by Plato (1991, 47 49).

We are content to note that some such answer is required from anyone who holds a weak supervenience thesis without the corresponding strong supervenience thesis.

Thus someone who asserts a weak supervenience thesis but denies the corresponding strong supervenience thesis must provide an explanation of why the weak supervenience thesis is true that does not entail that the relevant strong supervenience thesis is true as well.

Empiricists also deny the implication of the corresponding Innate Concept thesis that we have innate ideas in the subject area.

In any case, those who assert a weak or intermediate global supervenience thesis while denying the corresponding strong global supervenience thesis need to provide an explanation of why weak or intermediate global supervenience holds that does not entail that strong global supervenience holds.