Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(46)
The converse implication usually fails.
We will prove also the converse implication.
The converse implication does not hold, however.
The converse implication is clearly also true.
Now we prove the converse implication.
To finish the proof, next we prove the converse implication.
Similar(14)
However, the converse implications do not hold.
However, the converse implications do not hold, in general.
Notice that (iii) and (iv)⇒ v)⇒ vi)⇒ vii) but the converse implications are not true.
Łukasiewicz supposes one accepts also the converse implications $CpLp$ and $CMpp$, as one would from a deterministic point of view.
Definition 2.3 A multivalued operator T : E → 2 E ∗ is said to be occasionally pseudomonotone if, for any x i ∈ D ( T ), there exist y i ∈ T x i, i = 1, 2, such that 〈 x 1 − x 2, y 2 〉 ≥ 0 implies 〈 x 1 − x 2, y 1 〉 ≥ 0. It is clear that every monotone operator is pseudomonotone and every pseudomonotone operator is occasionally pseudomonotone, but the converse implications need not be true.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com