the contract was

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "the contract was" is correct and usable in written English.
It is often used to introduce information or details about a specific contract. Example: "The contract was signed by both parties on Tuesday morning." This sentence provides information about when the contract was signed. Other examples: - "The contract was written in clear and concise language." - "The contract was reviewed by our legal team before we signed it." - "The contract was for the sale of the property." - "The contract was negotiated for several months before it was finalized."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Now the contract was unbeatable.

The New York Times

The contract was worth £70m.

The Economist

The contract was agreed in 2007.

The Economist

The contract was won by Motorola.

The Economist

It did, but the contract was changed.

The New York Times

The contract was first reported by Politico.

The New York Times

The contract was up for renewal.

The New York Times

The contract was terminated.

The New York Times

Now the contract was doomed.

The New York Times - Arts

The contract was now doomed.

The New York Times

Now the contract was dead.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "the contract was", ensure clarity by immediately specifying what the contract entailed, such as its terms, duration, or parties involved.

Common error

Avoid using "the contract was" without providing context. Saying "the contract was unclear" lacks specifics; instead, clarify which aspect was unclear (e.g., "the payment terms in the contract were unclear").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "the contract was" serves as a sentence opener, introducing information about a particular agreement. Ludwig examples show it leading into various details such as the contract's status (e.g., signed, terminated), content, or characteristics, indicating its role in setting the stage for further explanation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Academia

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "the contract was" is a versatile phrase predominantly used to introduce information about an agreement's status, terms, or features. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used. It appears most often in News & Media, as well as formal and business contents and academic writing and is versatile enough to fit multiple contexts if used carefully. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying which aspect of the contract is being discussed to avoid vagueness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the agreement stipulated

Focuses on what the contract specifically stated or required.

the terms included

Emphasizes the conditions and specifics that the agreement laid out.

the deal involved

Highlights the components or aspects that comprised the agreement.

the understanding specified

Underscores what the mutual accord formally outlined.

the arrangement detailed

Highlights the particulars that were thoroughly described in the contract.

the accord covered

Indicates the range of topics or obligations that the contract addressed.

the paper established

Concentrates on the creation or formalization that the contract brought about.

the bond ensured

Points out the reliability of the action

the agreement outlined

Emphasizes a formal description that highlights the basic elements of an idea

the compact set forth

Highlights the formal presentation or articulation of the contract's stipulations.

FAQs

How do I use "the contract was" in a sentence?

You can use "the contract was" to introduce a description, status, or feature of a specific agreement. For instance, "the contract was signed yesterday", or "the contract was for services rendered".

What are some alternatives to "the contract was"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include "the agreement stipulated", "the terms included", or "the deal involved".

Is it correct to say "the contract was agree" instead of "the contract was agreed"?

No, "the contract was agree" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "the contract was agreed", using the past participle of the verb "agree".

What's the difference between "the contract was terminated" and "the contract was cancelled"?

"The contract was terminated" suggests ending the contract according to its terms or due to a breach, whereas "the contract was cancelled" often implies it was voided or called off before it fully took effect.