The political economist, by contrast, generally denies that any purpose can be attributed to the promulgator of a legal rule largely because legal rules are not promulgated by a single individual with power to control unilaterally the content of the rule.
It's challenging the content of the rule itself that's most likely to bring results, at least on the litigation side of things.
For the positivist, the content of the rule of recognition is contingent on the social practice of the relevant public officials; they may, but they need not, adopt an efficiency criterion.[7] Similarly, for Dworkin, the law derives from the best interpretation of the past political decisions of the community.
Initially users may diligently fill in a checklist or score card before deciding on the appropriate course of action but this adherence may decrease as clinicians become more familiar with the content of the rule.
But the content of the rules matters less than the fact of the rule, the existence of a drinking regimen that both encourages and constrains alcohol's use.
Yet this can also be a set of rules for discussions among the participants, so that the content of these rules implies the existence of a collective agent without claiming that it exists explicitly.
The agency declined to comment on the content of the rules it is drafting.
Rather, the tax scheme reflects a commitment to fixing the content of the rules that determine valid property rights in a particular way.
Here they show an ability to combine the content of the rules into a whole, relate it to the meaning of the context and then act accordingly [ 21].
Given its formal virtues, and its agnosticism on the content of law, the rule of law seems innocent of charges of a capitalist bias, or a bias of any kind.
On the one hand, the political economy strand seeks only to explain legal phenomena rather than to prescribe either the structure of legal institutions or the content of particular legal rules.
