Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Additionally, the attribute coefficients of the considered systematic utilities show a good statistical significance.
Similar(59)
For generating records only an overall mean (with a value of 90) was considered in the first hierarchical stage as the CG effect, and overall means for the threshold (19) and for the slope (-0.5) were the only considered systematic effects in the second hierarchical stage.
Systematic Component of Variation (SCV)) and Empirical Bayes Statistic (EB) represent the variation considered systematic (thus, beyond chance).
Reviews must meet the following minimum criteria to be considered systematic: The review must include a comprehensive search for evidence from multiple sources of information (electronic databases, reference lists, etc)., describe the terms used in the search (in some way), and use dual review of studies for inclusion.
In order to investigate the implications of elements found in splicing regulation, we considered systematic mutation experiments presented in [ 23].
A review to be considered systematic should as a minimum report search methods, inclusion criteria and at least one or more aspects of validity assessment of original studies.
We also considered systematic review articles.
We therefore considered systematic perturbations to glycolysis in cancer cells.
We considered systematic reviews of interventions to improve professional practice when we designed our strategy [ 1].
For a review to be considered systematic, three criteria had to be fulfilled: a documented systematic search strategy, critical appraisal of included studies by at least two independent reviewers and taking the quality of evidence into consideration when drawing conclusions.
Of these responses, 15 (31.9%) described strategies that would not generally be considered "systematic" [ 22], where a physician independently completes and submits a CR referral form.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com