Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
(3) where (4) Our GS similarity measure [Equation (3)] averages the comparison values for each gene against the rest of the set.
Similar(59)
Equation (3), then, is computable in O md|??|) time, since it computes the comparison value for each gene in the set.
Table 11 Pairwise comparison values for the NFRs of the meeting scheduler example Usability Performance Security Usability 1 1/7 1/5 Performance 7 1 3 Security 5 1/3 1 Sum 13 1348 4.2.
By comparison, values for the intermediate group scoring 1 to 4 were similar at 34.4% and 35.3% (SEM 4.1), respectively.
The comparison generates values for each contiguous section of W-curve along with one each for the initial alignment and trailing portions of the curves.
In comparison, the values for non-subtype B samples were 88% and 84%.
For comparison, the value for the United States as a whole was 0.467.
Based on this comparison, the value for the threshold value at this location was classified as being normal, or abnormal at a 5%, 2%, 1% or 0.5% probability.
The comparison of objective values for the particles of PSO is made in the same manner.
The comparison of averaged values for classification of emotions is shown in Fig. 10.
To make the comparison of agreement values for the cases with and without visualization easier, we adopted classification levels.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com