Exact(1)
In the case of SDM, the version used in the comparison considers only side chain H-bonds to main chain residues (Worth et al., 2011), which tend to be less critical; however in this case the arginine side chain makes three hdydrogen bonds to other buried or partially buried side chains.
Similar(59)
In addition, the comparison considered the dam safety.
The comparison considered the storage, water release, hydropower generation and total losses.
The comparison considered k = 15 in all trials.
We performed the comparison considering the following aspects: The classification results presented in Section 5.1.
To perform the comparison considered in Section 6 we have to rank for a given country r all other countries according to a certain distance towards r.
However the difference was not significant if the comparison considered only SVD.
Several concerns are raised, including: a lack of baseline values for these measures (leading to a risk of baseline imbalance), and statistically significant impacts for only one of the comparisons considered.
The comparison study considers two reference prototypes made with gypsum plasterboards (GPB) and ordinary cement boards (OCB).
The third axis of comparison considers the proprietary dimensions of transgenic animals and their implications for the assumed public health ethos of One Health programs.
Third, it can be questioned whether we have properly dealt with the results of the laboratory comparison, considering the small sample size in the calibration study.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com