The least common reasoning concepts are: absence, compared, and suspected, which all have a 2% relevance, as well as concepts such as characterized, knowledge, similar, pattern, known, typical, process, marked, complex, growth, data, which all have a 3% relevance.
The next eight common paired co-occurrences for the literature concept (ranging from 12%-9% likelihood) also include two of the previously noted least common reasoning concepts: similar and compared.
The approach provided provide a common reasoning language among different experts from different backgrounds while helped to identify spatially explicit conflictive areas.
We are all prone to a common reasoning error known as the fundamental attribution error (also called the attribution effect and the essential attribution error).
Among other methods borrowed from computer science, the common sense reasoning community has sought to develop suites of "benchmark problems".
Nevertheless, this criticism has some legitimacy, the common sense reasoning community is sensitive to these criticisms, and is working to develop and refine the methods and criteria for evaluating this work.
These findings are consistent with the common clinical reasoning that extrusions and nerve impingement primarily produce radicular symptoms due to nerve involvement, and in this setting LBP may or may not be present.
In contrast, the use of research literature in clinical reasoning is linked to more common reasoning concepts about specific knowledge and descriptions or presenting features of cases.
Our in situ research documents common reasoning patterns used by students in an introductory biology course.
