Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Grade five in the classification indicates severe degeneration; the structure of the disc is inhomogeneous, signal intensity is hypointense, the distinction between nucleus and annulus is lost, and the disc space is collapsed.
Similar(58)
Analytical results of the classification indicated that a segment of β-strand had the ability to distinguish β-strands from segments of α-helix and coil.
Other land cover types were less important and the classification indicated that a considerable number of species, generally the most abundant, were not strongly related to any specific land cover type.
Several alternative classifiers were comparably effective at the classification, indicating (by the way that they differ) that there is more than one set of voxels (features) that contain the relevant information.
Secondary structure analysis of these ncRNAs further supports the classification indicated by the microarray data (see Additional file 2).
However, the results of the analyses were consistent regardless of the resolution of the classification, indicating that while this may influence the exposure itself, it does not influence the relationship between the exposure and the outcome.
The difference is that the correlation values are lower than those calculated using CNVs information but with higher concordance (29 cell lines) with the classification indicated by the presence or absence of expression of ER, HER2, and PR in the cell line.
According to Masada et al. [11], this classification indicates both the severity of the forearm deformity and the functional disabilities.
The resulting classification indicates that SNDL and DL are of equal expressive power, which strictly exceeds that of NDL.
Second, the energy classification indicates that it is necessary for DEA to classify inputs into two categories, which could not found in a conventional use of DEA.
The first-level classification indicates the anatomical main group and consists of 14 main groups represented by 14 letters (codes).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com