Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(29)
Similarly, the characterisation is equally straightforward.
As with Hal, the characterisation is hugely complex.
It's not just that the characterisation is unconvincing.
The characterisation is flaky, and the relationships two-dimensional.
For all the acrobatics, the characterisation is thin.
The characterisation is slight, the structure a little haphazard, and it's perhaps 50 pages too long.
Similar(31)
Matthew McKinnon 38, film editor The images were amazing but the characterisation was a bit weak.
Grade responded: "I would say that the characterisation was factually inaccurate and unfair.
But again, the characterisation was only skin deep: nothing was rushed, but everything seemed to be taken fractionally too fast for detail to register.
After that, the characterisation was discussed thoroughly with the second author several times.
The characterisation was carried out with combined analytical techniques including X-ray tomographic microscopy and ATR FTIR spectroscopy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com