Sentence examples for the challenge of explaining from inspiring English sources

But both sides face the challenge of explaining the complexities of intricate debt instruments to a jury of mostly laypeople.

And Republicans will face the challenge of explaining why they need to offer so many amendments when their party leaders have made clear that they simply want to kill the measure.

In the 20th century physicists George Gamow and Sir James Jeans took up the challenge of explaining the exciting new development of relativity and quantum mechanics, with mixed success.

Increases in energy prices are in the pipeline, and Mr Carney will face the challenge of explaining why these prices, set by global more than domestic demand, should not provoke a response from the bank.

Progress is slow, though, and work on the Paracelsus Dictionary has reached only the letter B.Philip Ball, who is a scientist rather than a historian, has chosen to take on the challenge of explaining Paracelsus by offering as much context as he can find.

Any view of this type faces the challenge of explaining why our emotions would reliably track such non-natural facts.

She writes about the challenges of explaining cancer to young children, spending endless days and nights next to her beloved, and coming to the painful realization that doctors can be wrong.

Some research has focused on the related challenge of explaining why the risks of violent victimization vary so dramatically from group to group, especially by age, gender, social class, race, ethnicity, and area of residence (mostly as a result of exposure to dangerous persons because of routine activities as well as lifestyle choices).

More generally, if one accepts the ban on bare identity facts, the challenge arises of explaining how all identity facts might be grounded in qualitative facts without doing violence to our modal intuitions.

By establishing a link between the intentions of human actors and the development of socio-technical systems, and, moreover, by postulating a general direction for it, Malaska takes on a major challenge of explaining the dynamics of this relationship.

And it is surely an objective (although non-trivial) fact that our experience of A will be causally between A and our experience of B. Now if perspectivalism cannot answer the challenge to explain the truth of the above principle, it seems that our experience of temporal asymmetry, insofar as it has a causal explanation, requires causation to be objectively asymmetric.