Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(31)
NTS is the senior author of the CCIS research study.
The CCIS demonstrated a LR + of 3.2 and the other scores tested had lower LR + values.
The CCIS had the best discrimination of the scores tested, with AUROC of 0.79.
Future studies will employ this method to examine how the CCIS impacts the time HCPs spend on their tasks, the interruptions they encounter, and whether the CCIS introduction is broadly a positive step for patient care.
The CCIS may be the most useful test to identify those patients who are unlikely to benefit from antifungal therapy.
The Candida Score had the highest specificity of 0.85 and the CCIS had a specificity of 0.79.
Similar(29)
Initial descriptions of the larger CCIS study design have been reported [ 20, 21], and other reports have compared pre- and post-CCIS data [ 22- 25].
Study data were extracted from the Critical Care Information System (CCIS) and Stewardship Program Integrated Resource Information Technology SPIRITT) databases, and from chart review.
Clinical outcomes, including ICU mortality rates, ICU length of stay and 48 hour ICU readmission rates, were available via the Critical Care Information System (CCIS) [ http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/criticalcare/ccis.aspx].
Moreover, those studies that have sought to elucidate the relationship between the introduction of a CCIS and the time spent by staff on in/direct patient care activities have published contradictory findings.
Future studies will examine whether the introduction of a CCIS facilitates the access to information and the completion of documentation tasks associated with patient care.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com