It's the B-grade and below papers that are very time-consuming to mark because you need to find the things that are wrong with it, but also the constructive things about it.
Durhan et al. (2002) presented evidence that there are other androgenic compounds, not clearly identified, in the Fenholloway River below the paper mill.
As can be seen in the slideshow below, many papers took different routes.
Although there was some disagreement among reviewers over the novelty of the findings, on balance they came to the conclusion that if you can address the comments enumerated below, the paper will represent a valuable contribution to the field that merits publication in eLife.
Tuck the point of the paper below the horizontal flap.
The table below summarises the papers and the key contribution each of these makes (Table 1).
Align the paper below the first line and rub with the nib of a colored pencil.
Simply fold the point of the diamond into the body of the shape below the piece of paper that is half-covering it.
Then, on the paper below the summary, write six key questions about your news topic, with each starting with a different one of these words: who, what, where, when, why, how.
For convenience and simplicity in the following discussion, we always use the notations below throughout the paper: ḡ = 1 ω ∫ 0 ω g ( t ) d t, g L = min t ∈ [ 0, ω ] g ( t ), g M = max t ∈ [ 0, ω ] g ( t ), where g(t) is an ω continuous periodic function.
