Sentence examples for the average dominance from inspiring English sources

At a 3 nm × 3 nm cross-section, the average dominance of SRS becomes ∼94%% in [110] channels and ∼84%% in [100] ones.

During continuous viewing of rival images, stimulus parameters affect the average dominance duration of each of the images.

From the reported perceptual episodes we calculated the average dominance duration, reversal rates and predominance (percentage time spent in one percept) for all experimental conditions.

Recently it has been shown that changes in predominance in binocular rivalry mainly results from changes in the average dominance duration of the strongest stimulus [17].

For spatial frequency, there is no clear relationship between a given spatial frequency and the average dominance duration [20], although it has been reported that the average dominance duration is lower for rival images with isolated spatial frequencies than for unfiltered broadband images [20], [21].

It is known that differences in luminance and contrast have a significant influence on the average dominance during sustained rivalry and that perception of luminance can vary between individuals and across the visual field.

Furthermore, the individual average dominance index (ADI, [ 30]) of each queen calculated from queen - queen aggression predicted the future reproductive status of a queen (likelihood - ratio - Chi2 = 4.50, d. f. = 1, P = 0.034, 29 queens).

The estimate of average dominance ratio in female life span suggested one or several overdominant loci.

The α bee was the most aggressive, had an average dominance index of 0.93, and could be clearly distinguished from the two subordinate bees in all 12 groups.

The perceptual dynamics gave average dominance durations typical of binocular rivalry with continuously presented stimuli (mean±s.e.m over subjects: 2.6±0.5 sec), as well as the characteristic gamma distribution of dominance times (see Figure 3C).

The β and γ bees, with an average dominance index of 0.37, and 0.06, respectively, were in some groups harder to differentiate either because they performed only a few social interactions, or both subordinate bees retreated in almost all their encounters.