Sentence examples for the assessment value from inspiring English sources

( y_i^* ) denotes the assessment value of ith alternative regarding all attributes for the ratio system.

Fitness is defined as the ratio of the assessment value of a particular chromosome to the average assessment of all the chromosomes.

The result shows that the assessment value of structure and function is −0.513 and −0.208, respectively, which means that the Liangshui River ecosystem is defective in structure and sub-healthy in function.

The assessment value of the crisp target-based reference point approach, i.e., (Z_{i}), is derived as (Hafezalkotob and Hafezalkotob 2015): Z_{i} ; = ;mathop {hbox{max} }limits_{j},w_{j},,D_{ij}. (8).

The assessment value of the crisp target-based ratio system, i.e., (Y_{i}), can be formulated as follows (Hafezalkotob and Hafezalkotob 2015): Y_{i} = sumlimits_{j = 1}^{n} {w_{j} f_{ij} }. (5).

Thus, the assessment value of the crisp target-based full multiplicative form, i.e., (U_{i}), can be expressed as (Hafezalkotob and Hafezalkotob 2015): U_{i} = prodlimits_{j = 1}^{n} {left( {f_{ij} } right)^{{w_{j} }} }. (10).

Then, alternatives can be listed in ascending order based on the assessment values of Eqs.

The assessment valued by these approaches then combined to obtain spatial quality ranking of each of the subdivided enclosed space.

The assessment values of ( U_i^* ) differ from ( U_i^prime ); however, the ranking calculated by both equations is analogous.

By arranging the assessment values in descending order, the ranking list of the crisp target-based ratio system is obtained.

The assessment values for the subordinate parts (i.e., the IT-RS, the IT-RP, and the IT-MF) are computed using Eqs.