Exact(1)
"No sector operates more inefficiently than education," said Forbes in a cover story on November 11 , 2013 and "a new breed of disruptors is going to fix it". The article predicted that disruptive education will be "the next $1 trillion opportunity," rivaling the dot-com boom of the 1990s.
Similar(59)
The article predicts that the new regulations will either decongest the sidewalks and playgrounds of illegally parked cars, or that construction companies will simply disregard the law.
The article predicts that if and when too-big-to-fail subsidies diminish, the largest financial firms will face strong pressures to restructure.
The article predicts that a rise in oil prices would increase oil producers' earnings so much that, as in 1973 and 1979, they would be unable to spend the money.
The accompanying article predicted that the political aspirations of Trump — then making a bid for the Reform Party nomination — could transform his Slovenian girlfriend into the first lady of the United States one day.
So much so that one article predicted that an upcoming increase in the price of stamps would lead to a big uptake in e-mail use.
That leading article predicted that it might be "politically difficult" for the prime minister "to err on the side of liberty" but thought him "a pragmatist" who "will realise that statutory regulation of the press would achieve very little".
One article predicted that in 2020 there would be more trees in England than in 1086, when 15% of the country was cloaked in woodland.
Another article predicted that Michigan would easily win, but that Michigan's inexperienced secondary could possibly be tested by quarterback Armanti Edwards.
(Grossman's June 3 article predicted that Jonathan Ives was "ruthlessly purging all remaining skeuomorphic elements from Apple's operating systems, thereby plunging users into a brave new world". Well, apparently that was just too innovative for Apple.
Then it's back to the survival issue again (brief interview with author of a notorious Atlantic article predicting that The Times might be out of business within four months; a former Timesman now at Harvard expressing outrage that anyone would say such a thing; no one noting that the article was published more than two years ago and therefore has already been proved wrong).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com